ArchiveArchive
Immigrants-Immigration-Fence-Barb-Wire

TIME magazine stupidly blames anti-vaccine immigration detention center workers for measles outbreak, ignoring infected migrants spreading disease

TIME magazine, along with several other mainstream media sources, is blaming a recent measles outbreak in Arizona on unvaccinated workers at an immigration detention center located near Phoenix, but is the story accurate?

The mainstream press version of the story claims that what’s being called “the largest measles outbreak in the U.S.,” was not caused by illegal immigrants being held at the Eloy Detention Center, but rather by workers there who refused to receive MMR vaccinations.

In their reporting on the issue, TIME and other media outlets are simply parroting government and Big Pharma vaccine propaganda, while ignoring the real story regarding this particular outbreak – as well as the bigger questions regarding vaccine safety and efficacy in general.

The TIME magazine version states that the Arizona outbreak – which now involves roughly two dozen confirmed cases of measles – “likely began with a migrant,” but spread due to unvaccinated workers at the facility.

Although this version of the story conveniently plays on the fears of a misinformed public, it contains many inaccuracies and much wild speculation.

Measles vaccine kills more people than measles itself

In the first place, no mention is made of the fact that the measles vaccine kills far more people than the disease itself.

As reported by Global Research:

“Comparative data provided by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reveal that nobody has died from measles in more than 10 years, while at least 108 deaths reported in VAERS during the same time frame have been linked to measles vaccines.”

In fact, the measles are not deadly at all – it’s better to contract measles as a child and develop a lifelong immunity than to risk being vaccinated.

Vaccination does not equal immunization

Another fact you won’t read in TIME magazine – or anywhere else in the mainstream press – is that being vaccinated does not guarantee immunity. In the recent Disneyland measles outbreak and others, 18 percent of those who contracted measles had already been vaccinated.

Furthermore, it is possible for those who have received measles vaccinations to transmit the disease themselves.

But the media ignores these facts – and others – in covering the Arizona outbreak. For example, the TIME article would lead readers to believe that it must be the unvaccinated workers spreading measles because “detainees have since been vaccinated.”

But if detainees are arriving at the center unvaccinated, could they not still be transmitting new cases before they receive their vaccinations? And, given the fact that vaccinations are not anywhere near 100 percent effective, and that vaccinated people may also be capable of spreading the measles, how can anyone be sure just how the Arizona measles cases were actually spread?

Fear-mongering by media shills

In blaming the unvaccinated workers for the outbreak, the Arizona health officials and the media are merely shilling for the vaccine industry and concealing the real story from the public eye.

If one looks a little deeper, it becomes obvious how the whole story plays perfectly into the vaccine industry’s hands. In other words, if we don’t force vaccinations in the U.S., then we’ll all succumb to diseases brought in by illegal immigrants. The mainstream media doesn’t specifically say that, but it’s pretty easy to draw that conclusion, based on their version of events. It’s vaccine industry-backed fear-mongering disguised as news coverage.

Until the vaccine industry is exposed, and its influence over the government and media dismantled, don’t expect any truth from the mainstream press regarding the dangers of vaccines and the fact that boosting one’s immune system naturally is far better than receiving a shot.

Don’t buy into the mainstream media lies regarding vaccines. Do your own research before ever allowing your own child to receive an MMR shot.

Sources:

Time.com

GlobalResearch.ca

NewsTarget.com

GreenMedInfo.com

CNN-Logo-Vaccine-Latex-Gloves

CNN admits vaccinations spread disease, as dengue vaccine creates more outbreak cases

It’s not an admission you’d expect to hear from a cable news broadcaster that has lambasted presidential candidates and others when they have suggested that vaccines are not 100 percent effective or safe, but CNN has made one, contradicting earlier stances taken by contributors.

On it’s website, CNN reported in recent days that a vaccine aimed at preventing dengue fever, which is spread by mosquitoes, may (unsurprisingly) actually do more harm than good. Citing a just-released study, the network said that the drug, which has the trade name Dengvaxia, “could lead to an increase” in the number of dengue fever cases if not properly administered. And given the fact that an entire study was done on the issue, problems must not be that rare.

“Vaccination in low-transmission settings may increase the incidence of more severe ‘secondary-like’ infection and, thus, the numbers hospitalized for dengue. In moderate transmission settings, we predict positive impacts overall but increased risks of hospitalization with dengue disease for individuals who are vaccinated when seronegative,” says an abstract of the study which was published in the journal Science.

Barely 50 percent effective

In recent years, the number of people infected with dengue has grown. Today, the disease spreads to an estimated 390 million people every single year, and it has gone global; cases have been reported in more than 100 countries around the world.

Hence the vaccine. But one that is obviously infecting more people than anyone likely anticipated.

Dengvaxia is the product of Sanofi Pasteur, a Big Pharma firm aligned with Merck. It took two decades to develop, and the company published results on its efficacy in the New England Journal of Medicine last year. In trials, the vaccine demonstrated 59.2 percent efficacy against dengue when all results were pooled across various populations and age groups. Figures varied when comparing various types of dengue, the age of vaccine recipients and whether or not they had been infected before. Study authors did not appear to measure its effectiveness in individuals who had substantially improved dietary intake.

“It’s effectiveness depends on the local epidemiology of dengue and how intense the transmission is,” Neil Ferguson, director of the MRC Center for Outbreak Analysis and Modeling at Imperial College London, which published the recent study, told CNN.

Now licensed in six countries, the Philippines was the first to introduce Dengvaxia. Recently, Brazil, which is dealing with an outbreak of another mosquito-borne disease, Zika, said that it too would begin using the vaccine. Mexico, Paraguay, Singapore and El Salvador also recently said that they will roll out the vaccine due to the high numbers of people in their respective countries who are infected.

Where is the apology to Trump?

However, in the recently published study, Ferguson used data from clinical trials of Dengvaxia to analyze the impact of utilizing the vaccine in a variety of settings. He found that using it in areas where there is a low incidence of dengue fever, and people are far less likely to have been exposed, could lead to an increase in the incidence of the disease. That, he concluded, is due to the complex nature of the virus and the manner in which it interacts with the human immune system.

“Unlike most diseases, the second time you get dengue, it’s much more likely to be severe than the first time you get it,” Ferguson told the news network. When a person who has never experienced dengue is immunized for it, the vaccine can act like a silent infection, which could set them up for an even greater infection if they are ever exposed to the virus in real form.

“The immunity we develop both protects us and places us at risk,” noted Derek Cummings, a professor of biology at the University of Florida, a co-leader of the study.

“It can have the potential to make things worse if it’s misused,” Ferguson said.

In the meantime, we’re sure that the Trump campaign won’t be getting an apology from CNN anytime soon for questioning the efficacy of the modern medical system’s regimen of vaccines, though he likely isn’t sitting around waiting for one either.

Sources:

Edition.CNN.com

Trump.news

NEJM.org

Science.NaturalNews.com